<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 109 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348954</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to file an interlocutory application before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the release of seized gold and jewellery. The ITAT was directed to promptly consider the application, taking into account the extended custody period of the assets and the potential discrimination in treatment between the petitioner and their brother regarding tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:50:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 109 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348954</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to file an interlocutory application before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the release of seized gold and jewellery. The ITAT was directed to promptly consider the application, taking into account the extended custody period of the assets and the potential discrimination in treatment between the petitioner and their brother regarding tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>