<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 108 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348953</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the parties to abide by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on similar issues pending before it. The Court clarified that the period during which the Writ Petitions were pending would be excluded from the computation of limitation if the Supreme Court upheld the legislation. The Writ Petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 108 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348953</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the parties to abide by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on similar issues pending before it. The Court clarified that the period during which the Writ Petitions were pending would be excluded from the computation of limitation if the Supreme Court upheld the legislation. The Writ Petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>