<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10107</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras interpreted section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983 in a case involving wealth-tax valuation for a closely held private company. The court ruled against the assessee, stating that the property partially leased out did not qualify for exemption under section 40 and should be subject to wealth-tax valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10107</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras interpreted section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983 in a case involving wealth-tax valuation for a closely held private company. The court ruled against the assessee, stating that the property partially leased out did not qualify for exemption under section 40 and should be subject to wealth-tax valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>