<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348944</link>
    <description>The court noted that the petitioner, an Advocate, had deposited the compensation amount in his bank account following the landowner&#039;s demise. As the petitioner had passed away, the court directed the respondent to issue notices to the legal heirs for verification of payment. The court instructed the respondent to conduct an enquiry to potentially exonerate the petitioner&#039;s legal heirs from any claims. The Income Tax department was granted liberty to pursue the legal heirs for any arrears of tax owed by the original landowner. The court decided to keep a specific amount in the petitioner&#039;s bank account until further orders were issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348944</link>
      <description>The court noted that the petitioner, an Advocate, had deposited the compensation amount in his bank account following the landowner&#039;s demise. As the petitioner had passed away, the court directed the respondent to issue notices to the legal heirs for verification of payment. The court instructed the respondent to conduct an enquiry to potentially exonerate the petitioner&#039;s legal heirs from any claims. The Income Tax department was granted liberty to pursue the legal heirs for any arrears of tax owed by the original landowner. The court decided to keep a specific amount in the petitioner&#039;s bank account until further orders were issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>