<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 89 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348934</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the petition, setting aside the appointment of Respondent No.3 as Director, declaring the increase in share capital as null and void, and restoring the petitioner as Director. The tribunal also declared Form-32 dated 29.12.2010 filed before the Registrar of Companies as null and void. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 89 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348934</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the petition, setting aside the appointment of Respondent No.3 as Director, declaring the increase in share capital as null and void, and restoring the petitioner as Director. The tribunal also declared Form-32 dated 29.12.2010 filed before the Registrar of Companies as null and void. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>