<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348926</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in rejecting an appellant&#039;s application to add grounds in an appeal under Rule 10 of the Tribunal&#039;s Procedure Rules. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal should not have assessed the merits of the additional grounds at the application stage but should have deferred such consideration to the final hearing. The impugned order was set aside, the application was allowed, and the Appeal was restored to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in line with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348926</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in rejecting an appellant&#039;s application to add grounds in an appeal under Rule 10 of the Tribunal&#039;s Procedure Rules. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal should not have assessed the merits of the additional grounds at the application stage but should have deferred such consideration to the final hearing. The impugned order was set aside, the application was allowed, and the Appeal was restored to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in line with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>