<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1581 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalty in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the alleged failure to maintain separate records for input services under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules. Despite initial non-compliance, subsequent adherence to Rule 6(3)(ii) provisions, including the reversal of credit and payment of interest, resulted in the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellants and overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The procedural lapse of not filing a declaration was considered, leading to the conclusion of substantial compliance with the law and the dismissal of the demand for duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1581 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalty in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the alleged failure to maintain separate records for input services under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules. Despite initial non-compliance, subsequent adherence to Rule 6(3)(ii) provisions, including the reversal of credit and payment of interest, resulted in the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellants and overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The procedural lapse of not filing a declaration was considered, leading to the conclusion of substantial compliance with the law and the dismissal of the demand for duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>