<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 625 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194861</link>
    <description>The CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside duty demands and penalties imposed on the respondent for a specific period was upheld by the Apex Court. The Court found no suppression of facts by the assessee, noting that the duty demand was based on a previous ruling and not due to any intentional evasion. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:10:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 625 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194861</link>
      <description>The CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside duty demands and penalties imposed on the respondent for a specific period was upheld by the Apex Court. The Court found no suppression of facts by the assessee, noting that the duty demand was based on a previous ruling and not due to any intentional evasion. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>