<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 681 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194860</link>
    <description>A dispute over adjustment of duty between split yarn and mother yarn became infructuous after the Tribunal later clarified its earlier order and granted the adjustment sought under Notification No. 47/85. The Supreme Court noted that the assessee had already discharged the balance duty due under the clarified order, with even an excess payment reported. As the subsequent clarification removed the grievance raised in the appeals, the Court found no need to examine the original merits and directed the department to give effect to the Tribunal&#039;s clarified order dated 11th/12th April 1994. The appeals were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 681 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194860</link>
      <description>A dispute over adjustment of duty between split yarn and mother yarn became infructuous after the Tribunal later clarified its earlier order and granted the adjustment sought under Notification No. 47/85. The Supreme Court noted that the assessee had already discharged the balance duty due under the clarified order, with even an excess payment reported. As the subsequent clarification removed the grievance raised in the appeals, the Court found no need to examine the original merits and directed the department to give effect to the Tribunal&#039;s clarified order dated 11th/12th April 1994. The appeals were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>