<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1037 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194858</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed by the Tribunal due to lack of jurisdiction of the Lucknow Benches. The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal depends on the location of the office of the Assessing Officer, not the place of business or residence of the assessee. Citing relevant case law, including CIT v. Digvijay Chemicals Ltd. and CIT v. Motorola India Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized that the situs of the Assessing Officer determines the forum for appeal. The Revenue was granted liberty to file the appeals before the Delhi Benches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 16:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1037 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194858</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed by the Tribunal due to lack of jurisdiction of the Lucknow Benches. The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal depends on the location of the office of the Assessing Officer, not the place of business or residence of the assessee. Citing relevant case law, including CIT v. Digvijay Chemicals Ltd. and CIT v. Motorola India Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized that the situs of the Assessing Officer determines the forum for appeal. The Revenue was granted liberty to file the appeals before the Delhi Benches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>