<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1703 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194856</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, directing the AO to recalculate deductions under section 80HHC and grant a 20% volume discount for TP adjustments. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the application of the CUP method and the deduction under section 80M.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1703 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194856</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, directing the AO to recalculate deductions under section 80HHC and grant a 20% volume discount for TP adjustments. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the application of the CUP method and the deduction under section 80M.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>