<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 927 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194852</link>
    <description>A suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act is a summary remedy limited to prior possession and illegal dispossession, and it does not determine title or better possessory rights. Mandatory interim relief is an exceptional equitable measure, available only on a strong prima facie case, irreparable injury, and a balance of convenience in favour of the applicant. An appellate court should interfere with a trial court&#039;s discretionary refusal or grant of interim relief only if the decision is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles. Where the trial court has taken a possible judicial view on the material, appellate substitution is unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 927 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194852</link>
      <description>A suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act is a summary remedy limited to prior possession and illegal dispossession, and it does not determine title or better possessory rights. Mandatory interim relief is an exceptional equitable measure, available only on a strong prima facie case, irreparable injury, and a balance of convenience in favour of the applicant. An appellate court should interfere with a trial court&#039;s discretionary refusal or grant of interim relief only if the decision is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles. Where the trial court has taken a possible judicial view on the material, appellate substitution is unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>