<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Petitioner Complied with Export Obligations; Policy Relaxation Committee to Address Technical Issues in Advance Authorisation Scheme.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36476</link>
    <description>Advance Authorisation scheme - the stand that there is no proof of export obligation being discharged, could not have been maintained once the petitioner was told to approach the Policy Relaxation Committee and it was empowered to relax any of the technical requirements or procedural matters - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:33:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Petitioner Complied with Export Obligations; Policy Relaxation Committee to Address Technical Issues in Advance Authorisation Scheme.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36476</link>
      <description>Advance Authorisation scheme - the stand that there is no proof of export obligation being discharged, could not have been maintained once the petitioner was told to approach the Policy Relaxation Committee and it was empowered to relax any of the technical requirements or procedural matters - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:33:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>