<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348894</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded for fresh consideration and others decided based on existing legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed functional analysis and consistency in the application of transfer pricing principles. The final assessment order was challenged and adjustments made in transfer pricing and corporate tax matters were upheld, with certain comparable companies excluded or remanded for further examination. Corporate tax issues regarding director&#039;s remuneration allocation were remanded, and penalty proceedings were deemed premature while interest issues were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348894</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded for fresh consideration and others decided based on existing legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed functional analysis and consistency in the application of transfer pricing principles. The final assessment order was challenged and adjustments made in transfer pricing and corporate tax matters were upheld, with certain comparable companies excluded or remanded for further examination. Corporate tax issues regarding director&#039;s remuneration allocation were remanded, and penalty proceedings were deemed premature while interest issues were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>