<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 34 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to non-compliance with statutory provisions and insufficient evidence to substantiate the debt and default claims. The decision emphasized the importance of proper authorization and clear documentation in insolvency proceedings, ultimately leading to the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 34 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to non-compliance with statutory provisions and insufficient evidence to substantiate the debt and default claims. The decision emphasized the importance of proper authorization and clear documentation in insolvency proceedings, ultimately leading to the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>