https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348862 The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding CESTAT Bangalore's decisions on the interpretation of relevant dates for refund applications, eligibility of CENVAT credit on construction services, and remand of refund claims on other services. The court ruled in line with precedents like Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., and affirmed the remand for fresh consideration. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed post-judgment. en-us Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:30:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348862 The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding CESTAT Bangalore's decisions on the interpretation of relevant dates for refund applications, eligibility of CENVAT credit on construction services, and remand of refund claims on other services. The court ruled in line with precedents like Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., and affirmed the remand for fresh consideration. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed post-judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348862