https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348854 The Department's appeal against the order-in-original No.50/2015 dated 26.10.2015, which required payment of 10% of the value of steam cleared due to lack of separate inventory for services taken, was dismissed by the Tribunal. Citing legal precedents and a previous case involving similar issues, the Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the Commissioner's decision to drop the demand. The Department's argument was weakened by the absence of a provision to demand the payment under Rule 57CC(1), leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the Commissioner's decision. en-us Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:30:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348854 The Department's appeal against the order-in-original No.50/2015 dated 26.10.2015, which required payment of 10% of the value of steam cleared due to lack of separate inventory for services taken, was dismissed by the Tribunal. Citing legal precedents and a previous case involving similar issues, the Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the Commissioner's decision to drop the demand. The Department's argument was weakened by the absence of a provision to demand the payment under Rule 57CC(1), leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the Commissioner's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348854