https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194839 The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on bad debts (partially), expenses disallowance, and consultancy fees. However, the issue of Rs. 19,00,000/- paid to M/s Adulex Display Service was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration due to the CIT(A) admitting fresh evidence without proper procedure. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:35:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194839 The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on bad debts (partially), expenses disallowance, and consultancy fees. However, the issue of Rs. 19,00,000/- paid to M/s Adulex Display Service was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration due to the CIT(A) admitting fresh evidence without proper procedure. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194839