<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10084</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal lacked the authority to reduce the penalty below the minimum prescribed in section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory penalty limits and upheld that penalties must not be lowered below the prescribed thresholds, as per legal precedents and the provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10084</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal lacked the authority to reduce the penalty below the minimum prescribed in section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory penalty limits and upheld that penalties must not be lowered below the prescribed thresholds, as per legal precedents and the provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>