<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 867 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194836</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ application, directing the respondents to approve the petitioner&#039;s service from 1.1.87 and release all arrear salaries and benefits. The court emphasized the binding nature of its judgments on administrative authorities and the principle of res judicata, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s rights were upheld as per the finalized judgment of Mahitosh Majumdar, J.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 867 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194836</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ application, directing the respondents to approve the petitioner&#039;s service from 1.1.87 and release all arrear salaries and benefits. The court emphasized the binding nature of its judgments on administrative authorities and the principle of res judicata, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s rights were upheld as per the finalized judgment of Mahitosh Majumdar, J.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>