<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,99,56,849/- as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), ruling that the land sold by the assessee did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from tax. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and allow the indexed cost of acquisition and improvement, and apply the beneficial rate of tax under section 112, after providing the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,99,56,849/- as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), ruling that the land sold by the assessee did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from tax. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and allow the indexed cost of acquisition and improvement, and apply the beneficial rate of tax under section 112, after providing the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>