<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1570 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348813</link>
    <description>Customs duty foregone and penalties were challenged where the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate had not yet been issued. The tribunal noted that the appellants had shown efforts and correspondence to secure the certificate, and the delay was not attributable to them. On identical facts, the appropriate course was to await the DGFT authorities&#039; decision on the certificate before confirming the demand. The lower orders were therefore not sustainable in their present form, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after the DGFT determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1570 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348813</link>
      <description>Customs duty foregone and penalties were challenged where the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate had not yet been issued. The tribunal noted that the appellants had shown efforts and correspondence to secure the certificate, and the delay was not attributable to them. On identical facts, the appropriate course was to await the DGFT authorities&#039; decision on the certificate before confirming the demand. The lower orders were therefore not sustainable in their present form, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after the DGFT determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>