<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10079</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the exchange loss incurred by the non-resident assessee in converting rupee earnings into foreign currency for remittance abroad is not an admissible business expenditure. The judgment emphasized the difference between capital and revenue expenditures regarding currency conversion losses and clarified the tax treatment of income earned in India and its transfer abroad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10079</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the exchange loss incurred by the non-resident assessee in converting rupee earnings into foreign currency for remittance abroad is not an admissible business expenditure. The judgment emphasized the difference between capital and revenue expenditures regarding currency conversion losses and clarified the tax treatment of income earned in India and its transfer abroad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>