<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348808</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no violation of natural justice principles, upholding the validity of the notice under Rule 4(3), confirming the sufficiency of evidence of default, and recognizing the Corporate Debtor&#039;s locus standi to file the appeal through its Board of Directors. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348808</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no violation of natural justice principles, upholding the validity of the notice under Rule 4(3), confirming the sufficiency of evidence of default, and recognizing the Corporate Debtor&#039;s locus standi to file the appeal through its Board of Directors. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>