<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1560 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s Korean Air, setting aside the service tax demand as they were not identified as the recipient of the service under section 66A of Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of identifying the service recipient for taxability, relying on previous Tribunal decisions to resolve the dispute in favor of M/s Korean Air.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1560 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s Korean Air, setting aside the service tax demand as they were not identified as the recipient of the service under section 66A of Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of identifying the service recipient for taxability, relying on previous Tribunal decisions to resolve the dispute in favor of M/s Korean Air.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>