https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348788 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming demands and penalties. Relying on legal precedent from the Supreme Court, it held that bagasse and press mud are agricultural waste not subject to excise duty, thus not contravening Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The decision established that availing cenvat credit on common inputs without separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods was permissible in this case. en-us Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:55:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348788 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming demands and penalties. Relying on legal precedent from the Supreme Court, it held that bagasse and press mud are agricultural waste not subject to excise duty, thus not contravening Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The decision established that availing cenvat credit on common inputs without separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods was permissible in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348788