<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1540 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand and penalties imposed on the appellant and manager for ineligibility of Cenvat credit under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002 for defective goods received back into the factory. The Tribunal relied on previous rulings and the appellant&#039;s own case, concluding that the issue was no longer res-integra. The Order-in-Original was deemed not legally sustainable, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1540 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand and penalties imposed on the appellant and manager for ineligibility of Cenvat credit under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002 for defective goods received back into the factory. The Tribunal relied on previous rulings and the appellant&#039;s own case, concluding that the issue was no longer res-integra. The Order-in-Original was deemed not legally sustainable, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>