<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1538 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348781</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the year 1999-2000, setting aside the order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file objections and produce documents, with the respondent directed to provide a personal hearing and conduct a new assessment in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1538 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348781</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the year 1999-2000, setting aside the order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file objections and produce documents, with the respondent directed to provide a personal hearing and conduct a new assessment in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>