<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1620 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194827</link>
    <description>The judicial member upheld the confiscation of vehicles and imposition of Redemption Fine under section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties were reduced for each appellant based on their roles in the smuggling operation and financial situations. The judgment was pronounced by Shri P.K. Choudhary, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA on 19-12-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1620 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194827</link>
      <description>The judicial member upheld the confiscation of vehicles and imposition of Redemption Fine under section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties were reduced for each appellant based on their roles in the smuggling operation and financial situations. The judgment was pronounced by Shri P.K. Choudhary, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA on 19-12-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>