<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10075</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside three notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for reopening assessments, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It was held that the jurisdictional conditions for initiating reassessment proceedings were not met, as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts and the reasons for reopening assessments were based on a change of opinion rather than objective facts. The court emphasized the necessity of valid reasons supported by objective material for reopening assessments beyond the statutory period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10075</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside three notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for reopening assessments, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It was held that the jurisdictional conditions for initiating reassessment proceedings were not met, as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts and the reasons for reopening assessments were based on a change of opinion rather than objective facts. The court emphasized the necessity of valid reasons supported by objective material for reopening assessments beyond the statutory period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>