https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194833 Revisional interference with an order framing charges is confined to patent defects, jurisdictional error, perversity, or cases with no evidence. At the charge stage, the court does not assess final guilt or the likely trial outcome; it only asks whether the materials, taken as a whole, create a strong suspicion that the offence was committed. On the allegations of collusion in quarry-related approvals and unlawful pecuniary advantage, the record was said to disclose a prima facie case for trial, and the High Court was found to have gone beyond its limited revisional scope by reappreciating disputed facts. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:52:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194833 Revisional interference with an order framing charges is confined to patent defects, jurisdictional error, perversity, or cases with no evidence. At the charge stage, the court does not assess final guilt or the likely trial outcome; it only asks whether the materials, taken as a whole, create a strong suspicion that the offence was committed. On the allegations of collusion in quarry-related approvals and unlawful pecuniary advantage, the record was said to disclose a prima facie case for trial, and the High Court was found to have gone beyond its limited revisional scope by reappreciating disputed facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194833