<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194822</link>
    <description>A section 6 declaration under the Land Acquisition Act is not invalid merely because the Government&#039;s satisfaction that the land is needed for a public purpose is not expressly recited in the notification. The statutory condition precedent is that such satisfaction must in fact exist, especially after consideration of section 5A objections, but the Act prescribes no particular form for the declaration. A declaration stating that the land is needed for a public purpose is sufficient, and the published declaration operates as conclusive evidence of that need. In the absence of a direct challenge to the Government&#039;s actual satisfaction, the acquisition proceedings were upheld and the suit was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194822</link>
      <description>A section 6 declaration under the Land Acquisition Act is not invalid merely because the Government&#039;s satisfaction that the land is needed for a public purpose is not expressly recited in the notification. The statutory condition precedent is that such satisfaction must in fact exist, especially after consideration of section 5A objections, but the Act prescribes no particular form for the declaration. A declaration stating that the land is needed for a public purpose is sufficient, and the published declaration operates as conclusive evidence of that need. In the absence of a direct challenge to the Government&#039;s actual satisfaction, the acquisition proceedings were upheld and the suit was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>