https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194821 A secured debt together with all attendant rights, title, security and interest was assigned by Sicom Limited to Mishapar Investments Limited, so the assignee became entitled to be substituted in the pending company petition. The Supreme Court had already allowed substitution in the connected proceedings and remitted the matter for consideration of the scheme under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. As no party objected, the application for substitution was granted and Mishapar Investments Limited was substituted in place of Sicom Limited. en-us Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194821 A secured debt together with all attendant rights, title, security and interest was assigned by Sicom Limited to Mishapar Investments Limited, so the assignee became entitled to be substituted in the pending company petition. The Supreme Court had already allowed substitution in the connected proceedings and remitted the matter for consideration of the scheme under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. As no party objected, the application for substitution was granted and Mishapar Investments Limited was substituted in place of Sicom Limited. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194821