<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 74 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194819</link>
    <description>Professional fees paid to an income-tax adviser for representing the assessee in assessment proceedings were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv). The court applied the broader test of commercial expediency, holding that expenditure need not directly earn profits if it is incurred to facilitate the carrying on of the business. Fees incurred to secure a reasonable and legitimate assessment were regarded as connected with the business as a continuing commercial undertaking, because tax liability must be ascertained before profits can be effectively applied or carried forward. The deduction was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 74 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194819</link>
      <description>Professional fees paid to an income-tax adviser for representing the assessee in assessment proceedings were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv). The court applied the broader test of commercial expediency, holding that expenditure need not directly earn profits if it is incurred to facilitate the carrying on of the business. Fees incurred to secure a reasonable and legitimate assessment were regarded as connected with the business as a continuing commercial undertaking, because tax liability must be ascertained before profits can be effectively applied or carried forward. The deduction was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>