<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1095 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the claim of write-off for irrecoverable advances made in the film financing business but disallowed the loss returned by the assessee, treating the income as &#039;nil&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized that the advances were part of the working capital and not in the capital field, relying on precedent that such irrecoverable amounts are considered trading losses. Both appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1095 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the claim of write-off for irrecoverable advances made in the film financing business but disallowed the loss returned by the assessee, treating the income as &#039;nil&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized that the advances were part of the working capital and not in the capital field, relying on precedent that such irrecoverable amounts are considered trading losses. Both appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>