<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Lack of Centralized Registration Upholds Jurisdiction of Other Commissionerates for Activities Across Locations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36456</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction - Appellant may well have taken registration for their Miryalaguda set up. However, it is not the case that they had taken centralized registration at Miryalaguda for all their activities in various places - jurisdiction of other Commissionerate upheld</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:38:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:38:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Lack of Centralized Registration Upholds Jurisdiction of Other Commissionerates for Activities Across Locations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36456</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction - Appellant may well have taken registration for their Miryalaguda set up. However, it is not the case that they had taken centralized registration at Miryalaguda for all their activities in various places - jurisdiction of other Commissionerate upheld</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:38:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>