https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194812 A Madras HC ruling on imported cocoa powder treated the Food Safety Regulations' testing parameters as illustrative rather than exhaustive and held that a rejection report was not vitiated merely because aluminium was not separately listed among the metals examined. The Court noted that the challenge was limited to the report's contents, no mala fides were alleged, and the regulations contemplated examination of metal contaminants. In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court would not reappraise scientific conclusions absent other vitiating factors, so the laboratory rejection report was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194812 A Madras HC ruling on imported cocoa powder treated the Food Safety Regulations' testing parameters as illustrative rather than exhaustive and held that a rejection report was not vitiated merely because aluminium was not separately listed among the metals examined. The Court noted that the challenge was limited to the report's contents, no mala fides were alleged, and the regulations contemplated examination of metal contaminants. In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court would not reappraise scientific conclusions absent other vitiating factors, so the laboratory rejection report was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194812