<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1527 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348770</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under section 14A of the Act and on account of VRS expenses. The court found that the assessee&#039;s interest-bearing funds were for business purposes and that VRS expenses were justified due to the operational status of the businesses. Referring to relevant judgments, the court dismissed the appeal, citing no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1527 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348770</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under section 14A of the Act and on account of VRS expenses. The court found that the assessee&#039;s interest-bearing funds were for business purposes and that VRS expenses were justified due to the operational status of the businesses. Referring to relevant judgments, the court dismissed the appeal, citing no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>