<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1510 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim for duty benefit under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, as the imported Titanium Pipes and Fittings were deemed generic items not specifically designed as essential parts of the Membrane Electrolyser. The appeals were dismissed, as the items did not qualify for duty exemption as integral components of the Membrane Electrolyser.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1510 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim for duty benefit under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, as the imported Titanium Pipes and Fittings were deemed generic items not specifically designed as essential parts of the Membrane Electrolyser. The appeals were dismissed, as the items did not qualify for duty exemption as integral components of the Membrane Electrolyser.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>