https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348751 The Tribunal confirmed the demand of customs duty against the appellant for foregone duty on imported capital goods as a 100% EOU. Despite the appellant's claim of exemption until 2006 due to non-debonding, the Tribunal found non-compliance with export obligations, leading to demand confirmation. The appellant's attempts to delay legitimate demands and inconsistency in pleas were noted. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing the appellant's failure to comply with export obligations and dismissing reliance on case laws, ultimately upholding the impugned order. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:12:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348751 The Tribunal confirmed the demand of customs duty against the appellant for foregone duty on imported capital goods as a 100% EOU. Despite the appellant's claim of exemption until 2006 due to non-debonding, the Tribunal found non-compliance with export obligations, leading to demand confirmation. The appellant's attempts to delay legitimate demands and inconsistency in pleas were noted. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing the appellant's failure to comply with export obligations and dismissing reliance on case laws, ultimately upholding the impugned order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348751