<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1491 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order determining the appellant&#039;s services as liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service, dismissing the appeal. Regarding penalties under Sections 76 and 78, penalties imposed were set aside in some instances based on established legal precedents, while penalties under Section 77 stood. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s reasoned decision, ultimately dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1491 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order determining the appellant&#039;s services as liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service, dismissing the appeal. Regarding penalties under Sections 76 and 78, penalties imposed were set aside in some instances based on established legal precedents, while penalties under Section 77 stood. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s reasoned decision, ultimately dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>