https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348720 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Commissioner(Appeals) for a decision on the merits without requiring any further pre-deposit. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case, and both parties could produce evidence in their favor. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal determining that the deposit could be made from the CENVAT Credit Account as long as the credit was permissible for utilization under Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348720 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Commissioner(Appeals) for a decision on the merits without requiring any further pre-deposit. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case, and both parties could produce evidence in their favor. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal determining that the deposit could be made from the CENVAT Credit Account as long as the credit was permissible for utilization under Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348720