<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 13 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10064</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ application, upholding the legality of the search and seizure operations conducted under sections 132(1) and 133A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the actions were justified, compliant with procedural requirements, and not motivated by malice or personal bias. The court emphasized that the reasons to believe need not be disclosed to the petitioner and that the search was conducted in good faith based on substantial material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 13 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10064</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ application, upholding the legality of the search and seizure operations conducted under sections 132(1) and 133A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the actions were justified, compliant with procedural requirements, and not motivated by malice or personal bias. The court emphasized that the reasons to believe need not be disclosed to the petitioner and that the search was conducted in good faith based on substantial material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>