<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348718</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no deliberate suppression of facts regarding captive consumption of Motor Spirit. The appellant had paid duty and interest before the notice, leading to the imposition of a general penalty of Rs. 10,000 for the contravention. The decision highlighted the importance of intentional evasion versus inadvertent omission in tax compliance matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348718</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no deliberate suppression of facts regarding captive consumption of Motor Spirit. The appellant had paid duty and interest before the notice, leading to the imposition of a general penalty of Rs. 10,000 for the contravention. The decision highlighted the importance of intentional evasion versus inadvertent omission in tax compliance matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>