<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10063</link>
    <description>Synthetic essence used in manufacturing aerated waters was construed as falling within &quot;blended flavouring concentrates&quot; in Item No. 5 of the Eleventh Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, because the phrase was wide enough to cover a flavouring concentrate formed from more than one ingredient. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 was treated as clarificatory rather than enlarging or restricting the original entry, since it merely made explicit what was already implicit in the unamended provision. On that construction, manufacture of aerated waters remained covered by Item No. 5, and investment allowance was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10063</link>
      <description>Synthetic essence used in manufacturing aerated waters was construed as falling within &quot;blended flavouring concentrates&quot; in Item No. 5 of the Eleventh Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, because the phrase was wide enough to cover a flavouring concentrate formed from more than one ingredient. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 was treated as clarificatory rather than enlarging or restricting the original entry, since it merely made explicit what was already implicit in the unamended provision. On that construction, manufacture of aerated waters remained covered by Item No. 5, and investment allowance was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>