<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 23 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10060</link>
    <description>Section 206C applies to timber and other forest produce only if the goods sold are first established as forest produce within the statutory description; the decisive factual inquiry is whether the produce was in fact raised through agricultural operations. The note states that, without a finding on that basic character, tax collection at source cannot be conclusively fastened. It also explains that the seller&#039;s obligation to collect and remit tax is reinforced by sub-section (6), which operates as a machinery provision and is not defeated by the absence of an express defaulting clause. Objections based on delay were rejected as not beyond a reasonable time, and the revisional order was set aside for fresh determination of the produce&#039;s true nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 23 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10060</link>
      <description>Section 206C applies to timber and other forest produce only if the goods sold are first established as forest produce within the statutory description; the decisive factual inquiry is whether the produce was in fact raised through agricultural operations. The note states that, without a finding on that basic character, tax collection at source cannot be conclusively fastened. It also explains that the seller&#039;s obligation to collect and remit tax is reinforced by sub-section (6), which operates as a machinery provision and is not defeated by the absence of an express defaulting clause. Objections based on delay were rejected as not beyond a reasonable time, and the revisional order was set aside for fresh determination of the produce&#039;s true nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>