https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194792 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case involving a disputed partition of family properties, the applicability of Hindu Law, and the discharge of antecedent debts by a mortgage. The Court agreed that the partition was not bona fide, applied Hindu Law as understood in British India, and confirmed the discharge of antecedent debts. The appellant failed to prove the fairness of the partition and the correct application of personal law. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the appellant's burden of proof and costs were awarded against the appellant. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:11:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194792 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case involving a disputed partition of family properties, the applicability of Hindu Law, and the discharge of antecedent debts by a mortgage. The Court agreed that the partition was not bona fide, applied Hindu Law as understood in British India, and confirmed the discharge of antecedent debts. The appellant failed to prove the fairness of the partition and the correct application of personal law. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the appellant's burden of proof and costs were awarded against the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194792