<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by investing in NHAI bonds over two financial years. The Tribunal considered conflicting judicial opinions but ultimately followed the Madras High Court ruling, permitting investments spanning two financial years to qualify for the total deduction of Rs. 1 crore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by investing in NHAI bonds over two financial years. The Tribunal considered conflicting judicial opinions but ultimately followed the Madras High Court ruling, permitting investments spanning two financial years to qualify for the total deduction of Rs. 1 crore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>