<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1449 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the respondent, allowing the refund claim for duty paid on imported goods despite not challenging the assessment. The Tribunal considered the doctrine of unjust enrichment and directed the Commissioner(Appeals) to thoroughly examine this issue within four months, ensuring a fair process for the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1449 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the respondent, allowing the refund claim for duty paid on imported goods despite not challenging the assessment. The Tribunal considered the doctrine of unjust enrichment and directed the Commissioner(Appeals) to thoroughly examine this issue within four months, ensuring a fair process for the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>