<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1445 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348688</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes strict bail conditions in cases involving commercial quantity. Where the Public Prosecutor opposes bail, the court must record satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The bail order under challenge did not show consideration of these mandatory requirements, so it was held unsustainable and set aside. The matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1445 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348688</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes strict bail conditions in cases involving commercial quantity. Where the Public Prosecutor opposes bail, the court must record satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The bail order under challenge did not show consideration of these mandatory requirements, so it was held unsustainable and set aside. The matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>